2008 Ahmedabad Serial Blasts: Supreme Court Stays Execution of Death Sentence While It Hears Convict's Appeal
A stay pending appeal is routine in death penalty cases and is not an acquittal. The case, in which 38 people were sentenced to death, is one of the largest terror trials in India.
The Supreme Court has stayed the execution of the death sentence of a man convicted in the 2008 Ahmedabad serial bomb blasts case, while it hears his appeal. A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and Augustine George Masih passed the order on Thursday, October 1, 2026.
What the court did
The convict, Ahmed Bawa, also known as Abbu Abubakar Barelvi, described in court records as an Indian Mujahideen operative, had appealed against the Gujarat High Court's decision to confirm his death sentence. The Supreme Court:
- stayed the execution of the sentence while the appeal is pending;
- issued notice to the Gujarat government, asking for its response;
- called for the trial court records.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta described the case as "serious", according to PTI.
What a stay means, and what it does not
A stay of execution in a death penalty appeal is a standard step. It ensures that a sentence that cannot be undone is not carried out while the country's highest court examines the case. It is not an acquittal and does not reduce the sentence. The Supreme Court will now hear the appeal on its merits, which can take a long time in a case of this size.
The attacks
On July 26, 2008, 21 bombs exploded across Ahmedabad within about 70 minutes, killing 56 people and injuring more than 200. Some of the explosions took place at hospitals where the injured were being taken, which made the attack particularly shocking.
The trial
Investigators merged 35 cases, covering the Ahmedabad blasts and unexploded bombs found in Surat, into one trial. Of the 78 people tried, 49 were convicted. In February 2022, a special court sentenced 38 of them to death and 11 to life imprisonment, one of the largest numbers of death sentences handed down in a single case in India. The Gujarat High Court later rejected the convicts' appeals and confirmed the special court's judgment.
What happens next
The Gujarat government will file its response, and the Supreme Court will examine the trial record. Other convicts may also pursue appeals. For the families of the victims, now waiting more than 18 years since the attacks, the case is a reminder of how long the legal process for terror cases can take.
For other recent Supreme Court proceedings, read about the Centre's stand on Katchatheevu and the Great Nicobar project case.
Sources
This article draws on the following reporting. Dates are when each source was originally published.
Written by
Newsroom
Reporting, explainers and analysis from The Daily’s editorial desk, based on verified public sources that are listed with every story.
More from The Daily Desk →Enjoyed this story?
Get the best of The Daily in your inbox every Sunday.
